Open Surgical Staplers

06 Jan.,2025

 

Open Surgical Staplers

GIA' reloadable staplers with DST Series' technology simultaneously cut between the two double staggered rows of titanium staples. The staplers and reloads are available in 60 mm, 80 mm and 100 mm lengths.

Ezisurg supply professional and honest service.

GIA' staplers with DST Series' technology are available in three staple sizes (2.5 mm, 3.8 mm and 4.8 mm) and may be reloaded for a total of 8 'rings per instrument.

The EEA' circular stapler with DST Series' technology embodies our commitment to innovation and collaboration with the surgical community. Our circular staplers incorporate more than three decades of experience and input from leading bariatric, colorectal, and general surgeons throughout the world.

DST Series' EEA' staplers incorporate proprietary directional stapling technology (DST), 3.5 mm staples, and a host of other unique features.

The DST Series' EEA' OrVil' 21 mm device is a DST Series' EEA' 21 mm anvil assembly, and the DST Series' EEA' OrVil' 25 mm device is a DST Series' EEA' 25 mm anvil assembly, both with the anvil head secured in the tilted position. The anvil assembly is mounted on a 90 cm long PVC delivery tube and is secured to the tube with a suture.

Only for use with the DST Series' EEA' XL 21 or 25 mm stapler.

The company is the world’s best disposable linear cutter stapler supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.

The EEA' haemorrhoid and prolapse stapler set with DST Series' technology is designed for use as a stapler instrument for control of rectal prolapse and haemorrhoid disease. The instrument places a circular, double-staggered row of titanium Directional Stapling Technology staples and removes a circular tissue specimen. It is offered in a 33 mm diameter size with either 3.5 mm or 4.8 mm staples.

The accompanying accessories include an access port, anoscope, and dilator.

Purstring' single use staplers have stainless steel staples that are attached to the structure or organ where a purse-string is desired. The instrument is activated by squeezing the ring handles.

The Purstring' 45 single use stapler has application in intestinal, colorectal, oesophageal, gastric and cardiac surgery for temporary and permanent purse-string placement.

The Purstring' 65 single use stapler has application in intestinal, colorectal and oesophageal surgery to place temporary purse-string closures.

EEA vs GIA Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis

Background: Various surgical techniques have been successfully applied to isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Many surgeons rely on stapling devices for the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis. Early follow-up results were compared for two laparoscopic techniques for GJ anastomosis: circular end-to-end (EEA) and linear cutting (GIA) staplers. Methods: Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed of all patients who had undergone stapled GJ anastomosis for isolated RYGBP over a 2-year period. The jejunal limb used for GJ anastomosis was fashioned at 1 cm / unit body mass index (BMI). Patients were grouped by GJ anastomotic technique, EEA or GIA, and the results compared. Results: 61 patients underwent RYGBP (EEA=32; GIA=29), with no differences in preoperative BMI or co-morbidities. Mean (±SD) operative time was shorter for the GIA group (EEA=180±56.1 minutes; GIA=145.3±27.9 minutes, P=0.003). There were 2 early re-operations in the GIA group for anastomotic leaks. Postoperative complications were not statistically different; however, there was an increased incidence of wound infections in the EEA group vs the GIA group (21.9% vs 6.9%, P=0.08). Follow-up at 6-8 months revealed an average percent excess weight loss of 46.7%±12.2% for EEA and 51.4%±10.7% for GIA (P=0.25). Length of stay, total hospital costs and operating-room costs were similar (P=0.34, 0.53 and 0.96 respectively). Conclusion: Operative time was significantly shorter in the GIA group. Complications, length of stay, weight loss and costs were similar between the groups. Selection of anastomotic technique may be based on surgeon preference, operative time, and potential for serious complications.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website minimally invasive surgery equipment.