-23: first observed in impure form by Michel Eugène Chevreul (Chevreul ) | : first synthesized by Lieben and Rossi (Goldberg )
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Yufeng.
Butyric acid is a four-carbon straight short chain fatty acid (SCFA) found in the esters of animal fats and plant oils. Its name comes from the Ancient Greek for butter, which is where it was first identified. Butyric acid is responsible for the foul smell found in rancid butter, parmesan cheese, vomit and body odor (Huang et al. ). Interestingly, as for isovaleric acid, some esters of butyric acid have a more appealing scent, and are often used in perfumes.
Butyric acid is one of three common SCFAs in the human gut, alongside acetic acid and propionic acid, which together make up 90-95% of the SCFAs in the colon (Ríos-Cavián et al. ). It is a major source of energy for the colon and is used in treatments for colorectal cancer, hemoglobinopathies and gastrointestinal diseases (Huang et al. ).
In industry, butyric acid has applications in food, textile production, animal feed, and biofuels, often chemically synthesized through the oxidation of propylene-derived butyraldehyde, or through syngas fermentation (Huang et al. ).
Most SCFAs in the gut come from dietary fibers: because humans lack the enzymes to digest these, they pass through the intestinal tract and are fermented by host bacteria. Butyric acid is a conjugate of butyrate, which is produced through the fermentation of hydrolysis-resistant starches and dietary fiber by anaerobic bacteria in the colon (Wong et al. ). Some butyrate is also produced as proteins and peptides are digested in the bowel (Macfarlane et al. ).
Diet, composition of the microbiome, and intestinal transit time all influence butyric acid formation, as with the other SCFAs (Morrison et al. ). Most of the dietary fiber from which butyric acid is produced comes from plant sources, such as resistant starch, cruciferous vegetables, and foods with a high sulphur content (Rivière et al. ). Dietary butyric acid is found in dairy products, red meat, and fermented foods such as sauerkraut. Around 5% of the saturated fat in dairy products comes from butyric acid (Månsson ). Butyric acid can also be taken in supplement form.
SCFAs are a popular research topic in medical biochemistry because of their potential role in gut function, glucose homeostasis, metabolic regulation, and appetite (Blakeney et al. ; Vijay et al. ). They are also known to influence inflammation and immune response.
In the colon, butyrate is a source of energy for endothelial cells, promotes cell differentiation and apoptosis, and can inhibit colonic acidification (Wong et al. ). Some studies suggest that butyrate can suppress colorectal cancer, though results are inconclusive (Silva et al. ). Butyric acid has been shown to influence pathogenesis of gastrointestinal disease and gut dysbiosis, and animal studies show that higher concentrations of butyric acid in the colon reduce the severity of inflammation.
SCFAs are known to act as signaling molecules between gut microbiota and host, with receptors in many different cell and tissue types (Morrison et al. ). Butyric acid is an endogenous agonist of one of these receptors, hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCA2). HCA2 is a protein receptor that can inhibit the breakdown of fats, giving butyric acid a key role in lipid metabolism. Butyric acid is also an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), a nutrient sensor which helps to stabilize lipid metabolism and inhibit cancer cell proliferation in the colon (Hong et al. ).
One notable way in which butyric acid regulates the inflammatory process is by stimulating the production of eicosanoids, which are lipid mediators derived from arachidonic acid (Vinolo et al. ). These are also known to regulate other immune processes involved in cancer, asthmas, and arthritis (Harizi et al. ).
As noted, butyric acid exerts several effects in the human gut which affect immune processes (Kovarik et al. ). Butyric acid is thought to increase acetylation of histone H3, in turn influencing the behavior of regulatory T cells, which can inhibit the immune response (Borycka-Kiciak et al. ). Through this mechanism, SCFAs link crosstalk between the human microbiome and immune system, though it is not clear whether this is by increasing tolerance in the microbiome, or by reducing the inflammatory response (Morrison et al. ).
Recent research has highlighted the significance of butyric acid in the gut microbiome, particularly its role in maintaining immune function and metabolic balance. For instance, a study investigating age-associated gut dysbiosis in older individuals living with HIV found a notable decrease in butyrogenic potential, correlating with alterations in plasma tryptophan metabolites (Brivio et al. )
A few clinical studies have observed an anti-inflammatory effect from the therapeutic use of SCFAs in cases of inflammatory bowel disease, radiation proctitis, and diabetes. Growing evidence suggests SCFAs support the immune system and metabolism through gut-liver inflammatory pathways (Morrison et al. ).
In addition to its role in the gastrointestinal tract, butyric acid may also contribute to links between gut dysbiosis and neurological conditions, such as depression, Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease, and autism spectrum disorder (Silva et al. ).
Studies looking at the use of probiotics to increase butyrate-producing bacteria in the gut suggest butyrates could help reduce anxiety and lower stress (Bourassa et al. ). A review by Bourassa et al. proposed possible mechanisms for butyric acids neuroprotective effects, including mitochondrial activity, G-protein coupled receptors, histone acetylation, and microbiome homeostasis. A clear line was drawn between the consumption of a high fiber diet, butyrate production, and protection against multiple neurological conditions through these pathways (Bourassa et al. ).
The role of SCFAs in lipid and energy metabolism links them to certain metabolic conditions. Butyrate has been shown to protect against diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance, which suggests it may offer potential therapeutic role in obesity-related diseases and diabetes (Lin et al. ). Animal studies confirm that butyric acid supplementation can improve insulin sensitivity: in one study, butyric acid caused fat loss and improved insulin tolerance in mice (Heimann et al. , Gao et al. ). More research is needed to confirm the effect in humans.
Gut microbiota have a well-established link to coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. One animal study has shown that butyrate supplementation could reduce atherosclerotic lesions, while another suggested that butyric acid seems to mediate gut microbiota and the circulatory system (Onyszkiewicz et al. ). Some studies have suggested that butyric acid affects arterial blood pressure, with one showing a significant hypotensive effect when butyric acid concentration in the colon was increased (Onyszkiewicz et al. ). The precise mechanism is unknown: it may result from bacterial metabolites having a stimulating enterosyne effect on the enteric nervous system, or from metabolite-derived molecules entering the circulatory system and influencing arterial blood pressure through various organs (Onyszkiewicz et al. ).
As noted, butyric acid has been shown in several studies to inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells in the colon, by inducing apoptosis, inhibiting cancer gene expression, inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, and promoting anti-inflammatory processes (Williams et al. ). However, other studies challenge the notion of a chemopreventive effect from butyrate, and there is a lack of agreement particularly when comparing in vitro and in vivo studies, referred to as the butyrate paradox (Lupton ). It seems likely that butyrates chemopreventive effect depends on the amount of butyrate, time of exposure during the tumorigenic process, and type of dietary fat. Our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms is likely to grow with the advance of genomic and metabolomic technologies. Because butyric acid is a by-product of fiber fermentation, this could explain why high fiber diets help to protect against colorectal cancer, as well as obesity, stroke, type 2 diabetes and other conditions.
Learn more about the roles of butyric acid and other SCFAs in complex chronic diseases such as cancer, Alzheimers disease, depression, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis and diabetes in our whitepaper Complex chronic diseases have a common origin.
Blakeney, B. et al.: The Branched Short Chain Fatty Acid Isovaleric Acid Causes Colonic Smooth Muscle Relaxation via cAMP/PKA Pathway. () Digestive Diseases and Sciences | https://doi.org/10./s-018--5
Borycka-Kiciak, K. et al.: Butyric acid a well-known molecule revisited. () Gastroenterology Review | https://doi.org/10./pg..
Bourassa, M. et al.: Butyrate, Neuroepigenetics and the Gut Microbiome: Can a High Fiber Diet Improve Brain Health? () Neuroscience Letters | https://doi.org/10./j.neulet..02.009
Brivio, P et al.: Venlafaxines effect on resilience to stress is associated with a shift in the balance between glucose and fatty acid utilization () Neuropsychopharmacol. 48, ). | https://doi.org/10./s-023--0
Chevreul, M.: Recherches Chimiques sur les Corps Gras dOrigine Animale. () Paris: Imprimerie Nationale | https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark://bpt6kv/f459.item
Gao, Z. et al.: Butyrate Improves Insulin Sensitivity and Increases Energy Expenditure in Mice. () Diabetes | https://doi.org/10./db08-
Goldberg, I. and Rokem, JS.: Organic and Fatty Acid Production () Microbial. Vol. 3rd edition, in Encyclopedia of Microbiology, by Moselio Schaechter | https://doi.org/10./B978-0-12--8.-3
Harizi, H. et al.: Arachidonic-acid-derived eicosanoids: roles in biology and immunopathology. () Trends in Molecular Medicine | https://doi.org/10./j.molmed..08.005
Heimann, E. et al.: Propionic acid and butyric acid inhibit lipolysis and de novo lipogenesis and increase insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in primary rat adipocytes. () Adipocyte | https://doi.org/10./..
Hong, F. et al.: PPARs as Nuclear Receptors for Nutrient and Energy Metabolism. () Molecules | https://doi.org/10./molecules
Huang, J. et al.: Biosynthesis of butyric acid by Clostridium tyrobutyricum. () Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology | https://doi.org/10./..
Kovarik, K. et al.: Eicosanoid modulation by the short-chain fatty acid n-butyrate in human monocytes. () Immunology | https://doi.org/10./imm.
Lin, H. et al.: Butyrate and Propionate Protect against Diet-Induced Obesity and Regulate Gut Hormones via Free Fatty Acid Receptor 3-Independent Mechanisms. () PLoS One | https://doi.org/10./journal.pone.
Lupton, J.: Microbial Degradation Products Influence Colon Cancer Risk: the Butyrate Controversy. () The Journal of Nutrition | https://doi.org/10./jn/134.2.479
Macfarlane, G. and Macfarlane, T.: Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. () Proceedings of the Nutrition Society | https://doi.org/10./PNS
Månsson, HL.: Fatty acids in bovine milk fat. () Food and Nutrition Research | https://doi.org/10./fnr.v52i0.
Morrison, D. and Preston T.: Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. () Gut Microbes | https://doi.org/10./..
Onyszkiewicz, M. et al.: Butyric acid, a gut bacteria metabolite, lowers arterial blood pressure via colon-vagus nerve signaling and GPR41/43 receptors. () Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology | https://doi.org/10./s-019--y
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit butyric acid benefits.
Ríos-Cavián, D. et al.: Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and their Link with Diet and Human Health.() Frontiers in Microbiology | https://doi.org/10./fmicb..
Rivière, A. et al.: Bifidobacteria and Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria: Importance and Strategies for Their Stimulation in the Human Gut. () Frontiers in Microbiology | https://doi.org/10./fmicb..
Silva, Y. et al.: The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids From Gut Microbiota in Gut-Brain Communication. () Frontiers in Endocrinology | https://doi.org/10./fendo..
Vijay A. Et al.: The prebiotic effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation: A six-week randomised intervention trial () Gut Microbes 13(1):1-11 | DOI: 10./..
Vinolo, M. et al.: Regulation of Inflammation by Short Chain Fatty Acids. Nutrients () | https://doi.org/10./nu
Williams, E. et al.: Anti-cancer effects of butyrate: use of micro-array technology to investigate mechanisms. () Proceedings of the Nutrition Society | https://doi.org/10./PNS
Wong, J. et al.: Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. () Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | https://doi.org/10./--
The properties of butyric acid, and the role it plays in the gastrointestinal tract, have been known for many years. However, the newest research shows that butyric acid still remains a molecule with a potential that has not as yet been fully exploited. The article provides an outline of relevant up-to-date knowledge about butyric acid, and presents the expert position on the clinical benefits of using butyric acid products in the therapy of gastrointestinal diseases.
Keywords: butyric acid, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, constipation, diarrhea
The properties of butyric acid, and the role it plays in the gastrointestinal tract, have been known for a long time now. However, butyric acid is still subject to intensive research which shows that it is a factor in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal diseases, and has a range of previously unknown properties and potential therapeutic applications. Butyric acid remains a molecule with a potential that has not as yet been fully elucidated and realized.
The article provides an outline of relevant up-to-date knowledge about butyric acid, and presents the position of gastroenterology and surgery experts on the clinical benefits of using butyric acid products in the therapy of patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Since the article is a follow-up to the study published in [1], a number of issues already addressed in detail in the previous publication are left out, including the formation and roles of butyric acid in the gastrointestinal tract, problems associated with its deficiency, clinical indications and basic use recommendations.
Research conducted in recent years provides evidence for the long postulated mechanism of action of butyric acid, i.e. its effect on the gastrointestinal immune system. In studies on mice, Furusawa et al. [2] showed that the concentration of butyric acid on the colonic wall stimulates the differentiation of Treg lymphocytes, reducing the severity of inflammation induced by the transfer of TCD4+ CD45RBhi lymphocytes into Rag1/ mice. Furthermore, in an in vitro study on undifferentiated T cells incubated with butyric acid, the authors demonstrated an increased acetylation of histone H3, which points to a possible mechanism by which butyric acid (produced by bacteria residing in the gastrointestinal tract) affects the differentiation and specialization of Treg lymphocytes. These very interesting studies have shed new light on the relationship between the host and the gut microflora, and its impact on immune homeostasis in the gut.
Gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) and enterocytes (intestinal epithelial cells IECs) act as the first barrier of defence against bacterial invasion through the secretion of mucins and/or defensins (antibacterial peptides) or the detection of pathogens by Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In addition, specialized IECs are capable of transporting bacterial antigens and presenting them to the immune cells in the lamina propria of the gut wall. The system becomes disturbed, for example, in the elderly, as the relationships and proportions between bacterial groups forming the microbiome are thrown off balance [3]. Similar unfavourable alterations in the microbiome composition are observed in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), which is described in subsequent sections below. For many years butyric acid has been postulated to play a role of a primary messenger between commensal bacteria and the human immune system. In this understanding, the presence of butyric acid at an appropriate physiological concentration in the colonic lumen is interpreted by the body as information that the bacterial equilibrium is not disturbed, which reduces immune response and tolerance to thousands of antigens representing commensal bacteria and, hence, prevents the initiation of the inflammatory process [4].
Symptoms associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction, such as IBS, are estimated to occur in 1030% of the population. The main signs of the disorder include abdominal pain, diarrhoea and altered conditions in the colon. Patients are typically advised to adopt dietary and lifestyle modifications, and are referred for psychotherapy. Pharmacological management includes antibiotics which act topically in the gastrointestinal lumen (rifaxamin) and, additionally, probiotics and in some cases antidepressants.
In one study, the microbiomes of 113 patients with IBS and 66 control subjects were analyzed. A statistically significant decrease in the amount of butyric acid-producing bacteria was found in the group of patients with IBS, particularly with IBS-D and IBS-M (p = 0.002). Also, there was a statistically significant reduction in the level of methane-producing bacteria (Methanobacteria) (p = 0.005), which increases local oxygen reservoirs and probably contributes to an increased incidence of flatulence in this patient group [5].
Considering the above, a compound which offers a high chance for success in the therapy of dysfunctional bowel disorders is sodium butyrate. In Tarnowski et al. [6] assessed the effect of sodium butyrate on selected clinical parameters in patients with irritable bowel syndrome during a 6-week follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: control group (29 patients) receiving standard treatment with trimebutine and mebeverine (depending on the characteristics of the disease) throughout the entire follow-up period, and study group receiving sodium butyrate at 300 mg daily as an add-on to standard therapy. At baseline and 6 weeks into the study, a questionnaire was completed to assess the symptoms of the disease (on a scale from 0 to 5) and the quality of life IBS-QoL (on a scale from 0 to 100). At the time of inclusion in the study, there were no differences between the patient groups in the severity of discomfort and pain, bowel movement disorders, severity of flatulence and other gastrointestinal and IBS-associated symptoms. After 6 weeks, a statistically significant improvement was observed in the study group for the symptoms listed above. What is more, a significant improvement was achieved in the subjective assessment of the quality of life in all patients receiving sodium butyrate.
In Banasiewicz et al. [7] conducted a randomized clinical trial in a group of 66 patients with a long history of IBS diagnosed on the basis of the ROME II Diagnostic Criteria. The patients were divided into the control group (n = 32) and the study group receiving sodium butyrate (n = 34) at 300 mg/day (2 × 150 mg). The follow-up was 4, and then 12 weeks, with data collected using the Visual Analogue Scale for IBS (VAS-IBS). The following symptoms were assessed: pain in the epigastric region, incidence of flatulence, bowel movement disorders, mucus in stool and the quality of life (based on the IBS-QoL questionnaire). Four weeks after the start of the study, a significant decrease in the incidence of epigastric pain and a reduction in the severity of pain after meals were noted in the group receiving sodium butyrate. After 12 weeks, there was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of all the symptoms studied, accompanied by an improvement in the patients QoL. In subsequently published results [8], based on the closed question (yes or no) Did you achieve good relief from abdominal discomfort or pain associated with IBS during the last week preceding the follow-up visit?, Yes answers were achieved respectively in 32 and 6.25% of the patients (p < 0.01) in the study and control groups at week 4 of the study, and in 53 and 15.6% of the patients (p < 0.01), respectively, at week 12 of the study. Importantly, patients in both groups continued previously prescribed therapy (e.g. drotaverine, trimebutine) throughout the whole duration of the study, and received standard treatment for at least 3 months before the inclusion in the study. The authors concluded that butyric acid used as adjunct therapy in the treatment of IBS reduced the incidence of selected clinical symptoms, however without any effect on their severity.
Abdominal pain in patients with IBS is typically a result of disorders related to digestion and fermentation, and the build-up of gases in the gut lumen. The underlying causes of functional diseases have not been fully investigated and require further study, however existing hypotheses suggest that pain is a consequence of transmission abnormalities in the gut-brain axis. In patients with intestinal dysfunctions (IBS) sodium butyrate is one of the key factors contributing to gut homeostasis, enhancing natural processes of healing and regeneration in the intestinal epithelium. A decreased incidence of pain characteristic of IBS may be attributable to a diminished receptor sensitivity in the gut [9]. Based on an animal model butyric acid was shown to have an ability to increase the neuronal concentration in the Enteric Nervous System via phenotypic changes in the enteric neurons [10], which in turn has a favourable effect on colonic transit [11].
Another study assessed the efficacy of butyric acid in IBS. Fifty patients with IBS were divided into two subgroups IBS with constipation (IBS-C) and IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and treated with butyric acid in the form of enteric-coated tablets at a dose of 1 g/day. The IBS form and the severity of symptoms were recorded at baseline and at the end of the study. Butyric acid treatment resulted in a reduction or normalization of symptoms in 71% of patients with IBS-D and in 16% of patients with IBS-C (p < 0.005) [12].
As of today, more than 1,000 bacteria residing in the human gastrointestinal tract have been detected. A vast majority of them belong to about a dozen genera. In adults, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the most abundant phyla, and the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio appears to determine the bacterial balance in the gastrointestinal tract (in healthy adults Firmicutes is the dominant phylum, however the proportion evolves with age and changes as a result of specific pathological processes) [13]. Pozuelo et al. [5] studied the microbiome in 113 patients with IBS and 66 healthy individuals. Stool samples were collected from the studys subjects twice, at a monthly interval. Bacterial diversity in patients with IBS was found to be reduced in a statistically significant manner, which resulted from a considerably lower abundance of butyrogenic bacteria (p = 0.002, q < 0.06), particularly in patients with IBS-D and mixed IBS. The findings of the study are important for considering the benefits of using probiotics in patients with IBS. The most popular probiotic products contain lactic acid bacteria. Assuming colonic colonization with these strains, an increase in local lactate production can be achieved. Tsukahara et al. identified among the commensal bacteria residing in the human gastrointestinal tract a group of Megasphaera elsdenii bacteria belonging to Firmicutes which have an ability to convert lactates into butyrate [14]. Perhaps the same mechanism is responsible for the observed efficacy of lactic acid bacteria in IBS.
The composition of bacterial flora is determined by two main classes of bacteria: Firmicutes (a phylum of common Gram-positive bacteria comprising, among others, Clostridium, lactic bacteria and butyric-acid producing bacteria) and Bacteroidetes (Gram-negative rods classified as obligate anaerobes), making up 9099% of the total microbiome; Firmicutes is the dominant phylum (5080% of the microbiome) [15].
A study conducted in a group of 161 individuals aged 6596 years showed that their stool microbiota composition (assessed by molecular biology methods), compared to that determined in nine young volunteers (2846 years old), shifted significantly toward Bacteroidetes [16].
Basic research in an animal model demonstrated that butyric acid increased the effectiveness of peristalsis by improving colonic smooth muscle contractility and regulating neurotransmission, particularly in cases of impaired peristalsis accompanying functional constipation in the elderly [17].
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted in a group of 11 healthy volunteers involved self-administration of enemas by the studys subjects according to the following regimen: enema with 100 mmol/l of butyric acid in week 1; 50 mmol/l of butyric acid in week 2; and placebo (saline solution) in week 3 of the study. At the start and end of each test period, a rectal barostat measurement was performed to determine the severity of pain, discomfort, and the urge to pass gas or stool. Butyric acid administered at 50 mmol/l resulted in a decrease in pain score by 23.9%, at 100 mmol/l by 42.1%; and a decrease in discomfort score by 44.2% and 69.0%, respectively, at a pressure of 4 mm Hg. The authors concluded that rectal administration of butyric acid led to a dose-dependent decrease in visceral sensitivity which plays a key role in disorders of intestinal motility (including functional constipation), abdominal pain or discomfort [18].
A beneficial effect of butyric acid as one constituent of a multifaceted mechanism modulating gastrointestinal function has also been stressed in patients with stoma and coexisting constipation. Butyric acid supplementation combined with the use of probiotics should be adopted as one of the basic therapeutic strategies in this patient group, preceding treatment with laxatives [19].
Sodium butyrate has also been introduced into the algorithm of dietary treatment in patients with stoma [20].
Sodium butyrate may also prevent diarrhoea through an increased passive absorption of water in the colon and its effects on the gut microflora [21].
Butyrate is easy to administer and counteracts acute dehydration; it may be used in long-term treatment and prevention of travellers diarrhoea affecting individuals moving from countries with higher hygienic standards to destinations with a lower hygienic status. Even though antibacterial substances bring rapid and tangible therapeutic benefits in the treatment of travellers diarrhoea, there is no possibility to prevent the illness. In addition to standard recommendations such as additional caution about hygiene and food, travellers are advised to eat warm foods, drink bottled water, and eat only fruit and vegetables with intact skin. Pharmacological recommendations include rifaxamin, fluoroquinolone and Lactobacillus bacteria. Krokowicz et al. [22] made an attempt to demonstrate the preventive activity of a mixture of organic acids in a lipid matrix (250 mg of sodium butyrate; 100 mg of fumaric acid; 60 mg of citric acid; 50 mg of sorbic acid; 40 mg of malic acid) in travellers diarrhoea. A total of 42 patients completed the study, including 20 in the placebo group and 22 individuals taking the acid mixture 3 days before the journey. The incidence of travellers diarrhoea was 4.5% in the treatment group, and 40% in the placebo group. In addition, a statistically significant improvement was noted in the study group in terms of reduction in the number of bowel movements a day and relief of gastric symptoms (abdominal pain, nausea). Similar beneficial effects are observed after using a mixture of sodium butyrate and silicon dioxide (A300) [23].
Persistent and difficult-to-treat diarrhoea is one of the more common side effects of chemo- and radiotherapy in cancer treatment [24]. Karakulska-Prystupiuk [25] described the case of a patient with diarrhoea which developed during the period of myelosuppression in chemotherapy administered for anaplastic lymphoma. The differential diagnosis included recurrence of the primary disease and gastrointestinal tract infection. Subsequent microbiological tests excluded bacterial and fungal diarrhoea, and cytomegalovirus infection. Diarrhoea caused a considerable weight loss: 12 kg over 2 months. Dietary supplementation with butyric acid at 300 mg daily was initiated. After just several days the patient reported a substantial relief of symptoms and elimination of diarrhoea. In addition, the patient reported an elevated appetite and an increased frequency of meals. During successive follow-up examinations the patient was found to gradually return to his normal body weight.
Butyric acid shows a protective effect in inflammatory response secondary to inflammatory bowel diseases. Recent research indicates that chronic stimulation by interferon γ (IFN-γ) plays an important role in the formation of inflammation-associated colon cancer, and the development of colitis ulcerosa is linked to the gene encoding IFN-γ. An in vitro study conducted on human intestinal epithelial cells sampled from the colon of patients with colitis ulcerosa showed an increased infiltration with unspecified T cells in the mechanism of activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1). Butyric acid was also demonstrated to effectively inhibit STAT1 activation by reducing IFN-γ production, which results in the apoptosis of T cells of unspecified type and the suppression of the inflammation [26].
Molecular biological methods offer a possibility to gradually identify the relationship between the microbiome, diet, immune response and, consequently, the development of inflammatory bowel diseases. Experience shows that bowel inflammation may be induced by fat-rich diet. In one study, the composition of the microbiota in intestinal biopsies and stool samples was assessed using gene sequencing methods in a group of 231 subjects. One of the findings was a decrease in the amount of Anaerostipes bacteria belonging to Furmicutes in IBD patients who are active smokers or have a history of smoking. Similarly to Megasphaera elsdenii discussed above, Anaerostipes are bacteria responsible for the conversion of lactate to butyrate. In addition, the study revealed that patients with IBD had a reduced amount of Roseburia and Phascolarctobacterium bacteria which produce butyric and propionic acids in the colon [27]. The described ability of some bacteria to convert lactates to butyric acid may also be effectively induced by the commercially available mixture of eight lactic acid-producing probiotic bacteria VSL#3 (Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium infantis and Streptococcus salivarius). Studies in humans who used VSL#3 orally showed the preparation to reduce the clinical symptoms and severity of the inflammatory process in patients with pouchitis (after pancolectomy due to colitis ulcerosa) [28], and mild and moderate colitis ulcerosa [29].
A beneficial effect of sodium butyrate in post-proctocolectomy patients has also been demonstrated in research undertaken by the authors of the present publication. In a group of patients with pouchitis, sodium butyrate was found to be a beneficial element of combined therapy, accelerating the remission of symptoms primarily diarrhoea and pain. However, the main effect linked to sodium butyrate was a reduction in the incidence and severity of inflammation in patients taking microencapsulated sodium butyrate at 2 × 200 mg [30].
A high concentration of IgA-coated bacteria plays a role in inducing inflammatory bowel diseases, mainly Crohns disease. A group of researchers [31] assessed the effect of sodium butyrate on the composition of the microbiota in IBD-prone IL-10/ mice. At 8 weeks old, the mice were divided into three groups (four pergroup): normal (C57BL/6 negative control), IL-10/ (positive control) and IL-10/ treated with sodium butyrate administered in drinking water (study group). The severity of colitis symptoms, and the concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and short-chain fatty acids were assessed in the proximal section of the colon, whereas the percentage of IgA-coated bacteria and the microbiota composition in stool samples were evaluated by 16S ribosomal RNA analysis 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. The study found that sodium butyrate reduced the histologically observed severity of colitis and decreased the level of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-6 in IL-10/ mice treated with sodium butyrate compared with the positive control. At the level of microbiota composition, a reduction in IgA-coated and Bacteroidetes bacteria, and an increase in the group of Firmicutes, were noted in IL-10/ mice treated with sodium butyrate. The authors concluded that sodium butyrate lowered the risk of colitis, possibly by modifying the composition of the microbiota, i.e. enriching its biodiversity and reducing the amount of colitogenic IgA-coated bacteria.
A study by Zhang et al. [32] analyzing human colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT-116 and HT-29) treated with sodium butyrate at concentrations ranging from 0.55 mM found that sodium butyrate inhibited the growth of the studied cancer cells, stimulated autophagy and induced apoptotic cell death, thus revealing a new possible mechanism underlying the anticancer activity of butyric acid.
Mouse studies revealed a 75% reduction in the risk of colon cancer in animals fed fibre-rich diets in a mechanism with butyric acid-producing colonic bacteria acting as intermediaries compared to bacteria-free mice. It is concluded that the presence of bacteria producing butyric acid is a prerequisite for a fibre-rich diet to exert its beneficial effect which has been extensively described in the literature [33].
Another interesting role of sodium butyrate was described by Bueno-Carrazco et al. [34]. The authors found that oral administration of sodium butyrate supports the anti-cancer efficacy of photodynamic therapy in astrocytoma cells, most likely in a mechanism based on the modulation of gene expression and differentiation of cancer cells.
The synergistic cytotoxic effect on cancer cells was also demonstrated in a study conducted by Encarnacao et al. [35]. The authors showed that butyric acid increased the sensitivity of resistant cancer cells to irinotecan, a second-line drug used in the treatment of colon cancer. The finding may put a new perspective on the application of irinotecan which is regarded by clinicians who balance benefit against risk in the choice of therapy as a drug associated with uncertainty and interindividual variability of response. In vitro observations of colon cancer cell lines conducted over a period of up to 96 h showed a significant inhibition of cancer cell proliferation in the group where the cells were simultaneously exposed to irinotecan and butyric acid, compared to the group where only irinotecan was used.
The same group of researchers performed an in vitro assessment of the effect of butyric acid on the uptake of the 18F-labelled glucose analogue (18F-FDG) and the increase in glycolysis in a colon cancer cell line [35, 36]. The results show that the addition of butyric acid reduces the uptake of 18F-FDG and may affect the Warburg effect which is correlated with tumour aggressiveness. The greatest differences were observed at the lowest labelled glucose concentrations which, in turn, most accurately reflects the clinical situation. Furthermore, the results of the study suggest that butyric acid may play a role in cancer cells at an advanced stage of development.
In a randomized prospective clinical trial patients with clinically diagnosed diverticulosis (n = 73) were assigned to the control and study groups. The study group received sodium butyrate at 300 mg/day (2 × 150 mg) with a follow-up examination after 12 months. The study was completed by 30 patients receiving sodium butyrate and 22 control group patients receiving placebo. Patients in the study group declared a decrease in the frequency of clinical symptoms of diverticulosis and a significant reduction in the sensation of abdominal discomfort and pain compared to the placebo group [37].
Sodium butyrate in the form of enemas (combined in a mixture with A-300 silicon dioxide) may be a successful method of therapeutic management in patients with radiation proctitis. Sodium butyrate was shown to have an ability to reduce inflammation, as confirmed by clinical and endoscopic assessment. A key aspect related to sodium butyrate which appears to be of great relevance for this challenging and treatment-resistant form of proctitis is a multifaceted mechanism of action of butyrate which prevents inflammation, stimulates proliferation and normalizes the profile of secreted mucus [38].
The body of knowledge about the roles and importance of butyric acid has been expanding steadily, and the mechanisms by which butyric acid affects the relationship between the microbiome and the host are becoming increasingly elucidated. It is currently believed that the clinical aspects of using butyric acid described above arise from the effect of the compound on the local immune system, the mechanisms regulating the gut peristalsis, the severity of inflammatory processes and the regulatory mechanisms of the gut-brain axis [39]. The complex mechanism of action of butyric acid seems to play a vital role in maintaining symbiosis and homeostasis in the human body.
The scope of the present article is limited to oral butyric acid preparations used at doses which provide no possibility for significant quantities of butyric acid to pass into the systemic circulation. Consequently, it excludes studies focused on the role of butyric acid in reducing peripheral insulin resistance in diabetes mellitus type 2 [40] or preventing body weight gain [41], which represent important future challenges for pharmaceutical companies. The coming years are bound to bring new discoveries and fascinating reports on other areas of activity of butyric acid, and therefore new therapeutic opportunities associated with its use.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Want more information on isobutyric acid manufacturer? Feel free to contact us.